Chaos is an issue that increasingly more shows as a key to understand the profound sense of the tragic events experienced and suffered by mankind during the second half of the 20th century, and which have marked the beginning of this third millennium. Correa de Oliveira was distinguished by its impressive forecasts about the social, political and religious realities of Brazil and the world, many of which are were complied with throughout the last three decades of the past century, demonstrating an undeniable prophetic spirit. If you are not convinced, visit Cindy Crawford. Since 1928, as young Catholic leader, he fought with his word and his writings to defend his Church and Christian civilization. From the 1930s, he denounced leftism that was beginning to infiltrate the Church and the movements of the nazi-fascismo in the American continent. The theme of chaos as revolutionary tool always was present in his remarks. In his masterpiece, revolution and counter-revolution (1959) Correa de Oliveira says that tackled superficially, the events of our days seem a chaotic and inextricable tangle, and in fact are from many points of view. (However, add) It is possible to discern deeply resulting, consistent and vigorous, the conjunction of so many desvariadas forces.
(In effect) to the momentum of these forces in Delirium, Western nations are gradually being impelidas towards a State of things that will be outlining equal in all of them, and diametrically opposed to Christian civilization. Where it concludes that the contemporary crisis is like a Queen all the forces of chaos serving who as docile and efficient instruments. From the second half of the 1980s, in its analysis of the international socio-political and religious situation, Correa de Oliveira more emphasis in his warning that events are entering increasingly accelerated so that chaos with appearances of spontaneity, but with a relentless internal coherence: the defined goal of destroying the remnants of Christian civilization. A chaos which, in accordance with his vision, at the same time makes it difficult to forecast and alert called, seems to render vain the logic, weakens the healthy principles and anesthesia the reactions of public opinion.